[lbo-talk] The rape of education continues

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 08:46:34 PDT 2011


I have no doubt about the policy goals that you describe. But what does the Joyce Foundation or other liberal do gooders have to do with it? Attacking it is like kicking the family dog when you cannot get back at your boss. Kick the boss, and leave the dog alone. And how morality fits into it is beyond me.

Wojtek

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
> That bill is a deliberate attack on the working conditions, pay, and job
> security of all public emplouyees. I say all because the  attack on teachers
> is just the beginning.  Keep morality out of it. See the review of the '70s
> book that Michael Yates cited a week or so ago. This is just a continuation
> of an attack that began decades ago. One landmark of the ongoing attack was
> a WSJ editorial in the mid-80s calling postal workers the "last subsidized
> middle class wage." The attack on public employees, particularly teachers,
> if successful, will provide the grounds for another round of reductions in
> all wages. _Wages, Price and Profit_, particularly the last chapter, has
> never been more timely. Down. Down. Down. Wake up, Wojtek.
>
> Carrol
>
>  6/1/2011 9:20 AM, Wojtek S wrote:
>>
>> Chuck: "In other words they engage in a pseudo-science sounding
>> justifications i.e. they are lying. "
>>
>> [WS:] Oh, c'mon, Chuck, stop behaving like a cornered dog  biting
>> anything that moves.  They sound like typical liberal do gooders -
>> wasting their money but basically not an enemy.
>>
>> wojtek
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Chuck Grimes<c123grimes at att.net>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A link to another school reform bullshit? Whenever I read this
>>> kind of work, I look up the sponsoring agency. In the above case it was
>>> The
>>> Joyce Foundation. So I wiki-ed them.
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joyce_Foundation
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.joycefdn.org/content.cfm/advanceillinoisperformancecounts?pagep=programs%2Deducation
>>>
>>> ``In mid-April the Illinois State Senate passed Senate Bill 7, commonly
>>> referred to as Performance Counts, putting in place a series of changes
>>> that
>>> align with the Joyce Foundation's education program priorities. Joyce
>>> grantee Advance Illinois played a key role in the passage of the bill,
>>> educating lawmakers and advancing the education reform agenda.
>>>
>>> The landmark legislation is the fruit of months of collaboration among
>>> lawmakers, teachers' unions, the Illinois State Board of Education, and
>>> education reform groups. Policy changes included in the Bill are:
>>>
>>> Performance included as a factor when making hiringlayoff, and dismissal
>>> decisions
>>>
>>> Ensuring tenure rewards effective teachers with strong performance
>>> records
>>>
>>> Changing the nature of union negotiations to place students' well-being
>>> at
>>> the center''
>>>
>>> Now the above is the domesticated pig DLC version of the great wild pig
>>> version I listened to this morning on Doug's show from Terry Moe:
>>>
>>> ``Terry M. Moe
>>> senior fellow
>>> member of the k-12 education task force
>>>
>>> Terry M. Moe is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, a member of
>>> the
>>> Institution's Koret Task Force on K-12 education, and the William Bennett
>>> Munro Professor of political science at Stanford University.
>>>
>>> He is an expert on educational policy, U.S. political institutions, and
>>> organization theory. His current research projects are concerned with
>>> school
>>> choice, public bureaucracy, and the presidency.''
>>>
>>> Doug's show was definitely worth listening too, because it gives you
>>> insight
>>> into how these pigs think. Their greatest vulnerability  is found when
>>> they
>>> try
>>> to justify their ideas with empirical studies and data that show this or
>>> that. It often turns out that either the study didn't show what they
>>> said,
>>> or the study was gerry-rigged by some other think tank ideologue to show
>>> what it shows. This is even bad
>>> academic work, since the latter studies come from non-peer reviewed work
>>> that isn't published in a regular social science journals.
>>>
>>> In other words they engage in a pseudo-science sounding justifications
>>> i.e.
>>> they are lying.
>>> ___________________________________
>>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list