[lbo-talk] The Wageless, Profitable Recovery (NYT blogs)

Michael Pollak mpollak at panix.com
Thu Jun 30 11:03:42 PDT 2011


http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/30/the-wageless-profitable-recovery/

Economix - Explaining the Science of Everyday Life

June 30, 2011, 10:44 am

The Wageless, Profitable Recovery

By STEVEN GREENHOUSE

Economists at Northeastern University have found that the current

economic recovery in the United States has been unusually skewed in

favor of corporate profits and against increased wages for workers.

In their newly released study, the Northeastern economists found that

since the recovery began in June 2009 following a deep 18-month

recession, "corporate profits captured 88 percent of the growth in real

national income while aggregate wages and salaries accounted for only

slightly more than 1 percent" of that growth.

The study, "The `Jobless and Wageless Recovery' From the Great

Recession of 2007-2009," said it was "unprecedented" for American

workers to receive such a tiny share of national income growth during a

recovery.

According to the study, between the second quarter of 2009, when the

recovery began, and the fourth quarter of 2010, national income rose by

$528 billion, with $464 billion of that growth going to pretax

corporate profits, while just $7 billion went to aggregate wages and

salaries, after accounting for inflation.

The share of income growth going to employee compensation was far lower

than in the four other economic recoveries that have occurred over the

last three decades, the study found.

"The lack of any net job growth in the current recovery combined with

stagnant real hourly and weekly wages is responsible for this unique,

devastating outcome," wrote the report's authors, Andrew Sum, Ishwar

Khatiwada, Joseph McLaughlin and Sheila Palma.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, average real hourly

earnings for all employees actually declined by 1.1 percent from June

2009, when the recovery began, to May 2011, the month for which the

most recent earnings numbers are available.

The authors said another factor explaining the weak performance for

aggregate wages and salaries was the slow growth in weekly hours during

the recovery. At the same time, worker productivity has grown just

under 6 percent since the recovery began, helping to keep employment

down while lifting corporate profits, the study said.

Professor Sum noted that the aggregate wage and salary figures exclude

employer contributions to benefits and payroll taxes, while they

include bonuses, overtime, commissions and tips.

He said that nonwage benefits rose in real terms by $27 billion during

the first seven quarters of the recovery. "These small gains were

exactly offset by a similar $27 billion loss in real wages and salaries

over the same time period based on newly released data from the Bureau

of Economic Analysis," he said. "It was a wageless and jobless

recovery."

The study called that $27 billion loss in aggregate wages and salaries

during the seven quarters after the recovery began "the first ever such

decline in any post-World War II recovery."

The study said that of the previous recoveries since the 1970s, the

recovery following the 2000-1 recession was next worst in terms of the

share of increased income going to wages and salaries. The study found

that 15 percent of income growth went to aggregate wages and salaries

in the six quarters after the recovery began following that recession,

while 53 percent went to corporate profits. The growth in national

income can also go to net interest, rental income or proprietors'

income.

The story was very different for the recovery that began in 1991. In

that recovery, 50 percent of the growth in national income went to

wages and salaries during the first six quarters after the recession

ended, while corporate profits actually fell by 1 percent during that

period.

With regard to corporate profits, the report noted that the preliminary

estimate for the first quarter of 2011 was $1.668 trillion, an increase

of $465 billion or just under 40 percent since the recovery began.

"Aggregate employment still has not increased above the trough quarter

of 2009, and real hourly and weekly wages have been flat to modestly

negative," the report concludes. "The only major beneficiaries of the

recovery have been corporate profits and the stock market and its

shareholders."



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list