[lbo-talk] today's fashion directive

shag carpet bomb shag at cleandraws.com
Fri Mar 25 04:09:05 PDT 2011


At 12:03 AM 3/25/2011, Sandy Harris wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:04 AM, shag carpet bomb <shag at cleandraws.com> wrote:
>
> > excuse me? This would mean that I can't ogle men's legs and that would be
> > zero fun. Zero.
>
>I almost never wear shorts in public, but there are a bunch of factors in
>play.
>
>One is culture. Australian men, for example, wear shorts often. I've
>heard a Aussie lass living elsewhere eloquently lamenting the
>absence of shorts, for much Shag's reasons.
>
>Another is climate; shorts don't often make sense in Canada, but
>they do anywhere tropical that is not a malaria zone.
>
>Then there's legs. My failure to wear shorts will not disappoint
>any ogling ladies, nor would wearing them excite them much.
>
>In some cases, wearing them might be a disaster. I know a
>50-something mildly overweight party animal woman who
>routinely wears skirts that would be very nice, but somewhat
>daring, on a 20-year old hottie. They certainly aren't on her,
>and it is not that she's completely unattractive, just a bit
>tasteless. No doubt there's a male equivalent,
>
>Kilts, anyone?

Het men often say there aren't many breasts they wouldn't want to see; the same applies here.

Kilts are cool; I like skorts! Love a woman in a skort! With tennis shoes and peds with pom poms! :)

As for tastelessness, well ain't that always a bitch, especially here on LBO. Taste, understood as some objective thing floating above political economy and undisturbed by its machinations, is protected from critique.

shag


>--

http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list