>From the wiki on Rousseau:
``Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.[1]
The Sovereign, having no force other than the legislative power, acts only by means of the laws; and the laws being solely the authentic acts of the general will, the Sovereign cannot act save when the people is assembled.[2]
Every law the people have not ratified in person is null and void - is, in fact, not a law.[3]
The legislative power belongs to the people, and can belong to it alone.[4]''
In some dark humor gallery of history, Louis XVI called for an assembly of Estates General in 1789 to solve the financial problems of the monarchy. These estates were a tiered assembly (Third Estate) that represented the people or commoner (later to become the national assembly), the aristocracy of large land owners and urban rich a competing power to the central monarchy (Second Estate), and the Catholic clergy another competing power of moral authority and law (First Estate). So we have the church, the nobility, and the acceptible classes predominately petite bourgeois of small towns and the urban haute bourgeois of society. The non-acceptable and unrepresented, who probably the mass, were urban early industrial revolution workers and landless peasants of the countryside.
In other worlds Louis XVI was something of a liberalizing reformer. His plan blew up into the French Revolution. I think this is historically correct, but please change anything found wrong. Again from a wiki on Estates General:
``Necker [Jacques Necker, Louis's finance minister] sympathized with the Third Estate in this matter, but the astute financier lacked equal astuteness as a politician. He decided to let the impasse play out to the point of stalemate before he would enter the fray. As a result, by the time the King yielded to the demand of the Third Estate {to form a national assembly, voting by head count], it seemed to all as a concession wrung from the monarchy, rather than a magnanimous gift that would have convinced the populace of the king's good will.[1]''
In other words, Louis, like Murbark got Taquir. The Egyptians are going to have to sort their revolution out and hopefully not repeat the French example of the terror, citoyenne guillotine (justice by AK-47) and the empire to follow. I am praying to my secular gods of history and philosophy, the Egyptians know enough not to follow the wrong part of the French historical example. But as Shlomo Sand says, utopia should drive politics, not the other way around.
The tyrants of the earth of which I count the US and Israeli governments, should be praying to their stone heart big monied gods tonight that the people of the earth have not noticed a wave of revolutionary transformation getting near the 1660s, 1790s, 1840s, 1870s, and 1920s, provisionally 1960s. Like John Ross said, revolutions are a constant leakage, where you can't call a plumber to fix it.
CG