[lbo-talk] Calling the plumber

Chuck Grimes c123grimes at att.net
Fri May 6 18:50:00 PDT 2011


I want to just write as a way of thinking on Sand. He mentions Rousseau as the first to define national sovereign as belonging to the citizens of a state. This was in contradistintion to Hobbes idea that a people belong to or except state power over them to protect them from each other and outsiders. There are several different concepts at work here that are also effected by this distinction of national sovereignity. The first more obvious is that in the abstract, Rousseau's idea inverts Hobbes. The second, gets to the two different ideas about human nature. For Rousseau, human nature is based on the principle assumption that people are good at heart but corrupted by civilization. This is in contrast to Hobbes assumption that people are by nature rotten beasts who need the firm hand of the state to control their base instincts. So the point is that in the geneology of ideas, if you start with the world of Rousseau you will probably end up trusting the people to be in control of the state and state power. If you are in the Hobbes camp, you will not trust ordinary people to be in control.


>From the wiki on Rousseau:

``Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.[1]

The Sovereign, having no force other than the legislative power, acts only by means of the laws; and the laws being solely the authentic acts of the general will, the Sovereign cannot act save when the people is assembled.[2]

Every law the people have not ratified in person is null and void - is, in fact, not a law.[3]

The legislative power belongs to the people, and can belong to it alone.[4]''

In some dark humor gallery of history, Louis XVI called for an assembly of Estates General in 1789 to solve the financial problems of the monarchy. These estates were a tiered assembly (Third Estate) that represented the people or commoner (later to become the national assembly), the aristocracy of large land owners and urban rich a competing power to the central monarchy (Second Estate), and the Catholic clergy another competing power of moral authority and law (First Estate). So we have the church, the nobility, and the acceptible classes predominately petite bourgeois of small towns and the urban haute bourgeois of society. The non-acceptable and unrepresented, who probably the mass, were urban early industrial revolution workers and landless peasants of the countryside.

In other worlds Louis XVI was something of a liberalizing reformer. His plan blew up into the French Revolution. I think this is historically correct, but please change anything found wrong. Again from a wiki on Estates General:

``Necker [Jacques Necker, Louis's finance minister] sympathized with the Third Estate in this matter, but the astute financier lacked equal astuteness as a politician. He decided to let the impasse play out to the point of stalemate before he would enter the fray. As a result, by the time the King yielded to the demand of the Third Estate {to form a national assembly, voting by head count], it seemed to all as a concession wrung from the monarchy, rather than a magnanimous gift that would have convinced the populace of the king's good will.[1]''

In other words, Louis, like Murbark got Taquir. The Egyptians are going to have to sort their revolution out and hopefully not repeat the French example of the terror, citoyenne guillotine (justice by AK-47) and the empire to follow. I am praying to my secular gods of history and philosophy, the Egyptians know enough not to follow the wrong part of the French historical example. But as Shlomo Sand says, utopia should drive politics, not the other way around.

The tyrants of the earth of which I count the US and Israeli governments, should be praying to their stone heart big monied gods tonight that the people of the earth have not noticed a wave of revolutionary transformation getting near the 1660s, 1790s, 1840s, 1870s, and 1920s, provisionally 1960s. Like John Ross said, revolutions are a constant leakage, where you can't call a plumber to fix it.

CG



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list