Somebody: I strongly disagree. The woman's innocence is not at question, but Strauss-Kahn's is. I would agree there's a distinction between legal presumption of innocence and an individual's own assessment of the evidence, but even here, it's quite early in the case.
There's an assumption here that we should take the word of accusing women for granted. That's probably fair enough by and large, but then by granting that we incentivize women to make false charges when it suits them. Sorry, but that's just human nature (that dreaded anti-Marxist notion).
This whole case is a non-political matter until proven otherwise, and shouldn't even really be a matter of ideological debate.