> so what she's saying is, in spite of the fact that people in GA agreed
> to a diversity of tactics, then the thing to do is bag that
> agreement and show yourself to be an untrustworthy dipshit?
I didn't see the original post -- bozo-filtered -- so I had to do the email equivalent of dumpster-diving to retrieve it. But what a gem. Written by a 'senior fellow' at the 'Campaign for America's Future' -- which is to say, a Democrat.
Loved all the therapeutic/managerial turns of phrase -- 'behavior norms', 'achieve our goals', 'meet the standard', 'space', 'mission', 'empowered', 'confront', 'intervention', and of course boundaries, boundaries -- the word kept ringing at intervals through the piece like a cracked bell.
Of course what it came down to, quite explicity, was calling the cops, who were were told would consequently 'respect us more'.
My favorite, though: 'It might make sense to create a large committee whose job it is to gather information [and] build cases against offenders'.
Can't make this shit up, as the man said.
-- --
Michael J. Smith mjs at smithbowen.net
http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org http://www.cars-suck.org http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com
"I think the American people want a solemn ass as a President, and I think I will go along with them."
-- Barack Obama
(Okay, okay, it was really Calvin Coolidge.)