> Violence (on the whole a meaningless term since it covers so
> many radically different actions) should at least be confined
> to action which physically harms other people.
So if you burn down my house, you've not 'physically harmed' me?
If you break the Starbucks window and I get laid off for a week while the neighborhood cools down, you haven't 'physically harmed' me?
If you blockade the Port and the cargo in my truck spoils and I don't get paid, you haven't 'physically harmed' me?
I think you're making a distinction where there is none.
/jordan