[lbo-talk] Why not Paul

[Carrol Cox]

Paul's opinions are irrelevant. What could he do in the White House? He
could cause an endless ruckus, perhaps, and paralyze state action. But he
could not no matter do any more actual damage than Obama has done and will
do. It doesn't really matter much who is president. And don't cite opinions:
there's a gap approaching infinity between opinions and what happens in D.C.

And perhaps then his supporters would stay away from anti-war groups. They
do more damage fucking up left internal discussion than Paul could ever do
in Washington.

Carrol