Yes, both your points here are right. I had meant to add that I simplified and was assuming a certain kind of anarchist in what I wrote: direct action, alterglobo type; basically, the name in the subject line. But Robert's right that in the last decade anarchism has also moved in other directions, more syndicalist directions, to give it a name. (Someone should notify Jodi Dean of this; apparently the news moves slowly up to Geneva. ) This seems to have opened a rift (overstated though it is sometimes) between insurrectionist/direct action types and syndicalist types, one that can be productive and that also reveals what Robert says here: that anarchism can and does produce institutions and can be self-critical.