[lbo-talk] NYT editorial pro -Occupy Wall Street (!)

[c b]

I haven't read this post, but I presume it is a strongly negative
critique of Occupy all Street. But I do not believe that Mao's
proposition (Oppose Whatever Our Enmies Support) is true in this case.
It's true that the NYT is fairly consistent in its strong support of
the might of Capital, but it can misjudge, so I reject Charles's
argument that we should oppose the Occupy 'movement simply because the
NYT thinks it has positive features. Nevertheless, the editorial
should be interpreted by the people occupying Wall Street as a sort of
"Heads Up," a caution to consider their actions carefully.

Carrol

^^^^
CB: Giggles. That's not my argument.  Right on , NYT.