do you understand how failure could be the result of majority decision making? In other words, let's imagine that a 56% majority votes for full employment as one of the demands.
Do you see the problem with that situation?
> What do you mean by failure? What we individually think of as "bad"
> politics
> may win out, there's always that chance, but in a condition of free
> discussion and debate, call me a 19th century rationalist, but I'll
> take my
> chances with democracy.
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:27 PM, shag carpet bomb
> <shag at cleandraws.com>wrote:
>
>> Since you guys are so big on criticizing anarchists for lacking an
>> understanding of the drawbacks of consensus, could you name a
>> drawback
>> of majority decision making?
>>
>> In other words, please imagine for me the way the failure could also
>> happen through your preferred method.
>>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)