At 07:26 AM 10/23/2011, SA wrote:
>On 10/23/2011 5:57 AM, socialismorbarbarism wrote:
>
>>BTW, what are those objections to addressing someone as "Ma'am" about?
>>I didn't get it when the speaker objected and I don't get why it was
>>continued in the comments. What was supposed to be the proper form of
>>address?
>
>Good fucking question. That lady was bananas.
>
>SA
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)