saw this interesting post over the weekend about some of the origins behind the tactic of addressing the 99%, the role of public intellectuals, etc.
http://occupyeverything.org/2011/eat-the-rich/
also, relatedly, for those interested in the autonomist origins of the idea of occupation as a tactic to deal with the situation were find ourselves in - e.g., where cops corral protests, etc.
At the end, there's a list of readings online to learn more about the theoretical origins of thenotion of an occupation/occupy.
http://nottinghamcriticalpedagogy.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/the-logics-of-occupation-an-introduction/
> Of course, you could also define top 1% by wealth instead of income.
> There would be much more stickiness, almost by definition.
>
> SA
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)