[lbo-talk] occupation and situationists was Re: enemy's turf

Max Sawicky sawicky at verizon.net
Fri Oct 28 08:10:01 PDT 2011


Don't forget about the workers.

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Michael Smith <mjs at smithbowen.net> wrote:


> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:41:55 -0400
> Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> wrote:
>
> > How would the bottom 40% of the income distribution,
> > Walmart's core customer base, feel about [occupy Walmart]?
>
> Only one way to find out, eh?
>
> Doug's implicit line of argument here, I think,
> falls into the fear-of-backlash category, which
> is hardly ever, if ever, a sound strategic
> consideration.
>
> OWS is quite unusual in having widespread public
> support, which is wonderful but atypical.
> More usually, any time you have a march or a sit-in
> you piss a lot of people off. What inferences
> do we draw?
>
> Justify your answer, as a professor would helpfully
> remark in setting an exam.
>
> --
> --
>
> Michael J. Smith
> mjs at smithbowen.net
>
> http://stopmebeforeivoteagain.org
> http://www.cars-suck.org
> http://fakesprogress.blogspot.com
>
> "I think the American people want a solemn ass
> as a President, and I think I will go along with them."
>
> -- Barack Obama
>
> (Okay, okay, it was really Calvin Coolidge.)
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list