[lbo-talk] occupation and situationists was Re: enemy's turf

[Dennis Claxton]

At 10:37 AM 10/28/2011, MICHAEL YATES wrote:


>Carrol says that in the right moment, parts of that 40% might 
>support WalMart actions. Why is this so stupid?

I don't think anyone said it was.


>I learned that you never dismiss ideas or people out of hand.

But isn't that what Carrol's doing in his response to SA?  I think 
that's the kind of thing people are reacting to.