[lbo-talk] occupation and situationists was Re: enemy's turf

Dennis Claxton ddclaxton at earthlink.net
Fri Oct 28 10:47:14 PDT 2011


At 10:37 AM 10/28/2011, MICHAEL YATES wrote:


>Carrol says that in the right moment, parts of that 40% might
>support WalMart actions. Why is this so stupid?

I don't think anyone said it was.


>I learned that you never dismiss ideas or people out of hand.

But isn't that what Carrol's doing in his response to SA? I think that's the kind of thing people are reacting to.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list