[lbo-talk] autumn of the communes

[Max Sawicky]

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:


> . . .

3. Therefore John is a prick.


> *****
>
> Now, statement 3 is rude and probably  won't help the discussion. Not a
> good idea. BUT, shag says, it won't poison the wells of discourse, because
> it does not prejudge any respnse John makes.

Funny!