[lbo-talk] Dumb QOTD: What kind of labor producesintellectualproperty?

Sandy Harris sandyinchina at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 18:57:23 PDT 2011


An interesting article on some of the history:

"Copyright and wrong: Why the rules on copyright need to return to their roots"

WHEN Parliament decided, in 1709, to create a law that would protect books from piracy, the London-based publishers and booksellers who had been pushing for such protection were overjoyed. When Queen Anne gave her assent on April 10th the following year—300 years ago this week—to “An act for the encouragement of learning” they were less enthused. Parliament had given them rights, but it had set a time limit on them: 21 years for books already in print and 14 years for new ones, with an additional 14 years if the author was still alive when the first term ran out. After that, the material would enter the public domain so that anyone could reproduce it. The lawmakers intended thus to balance the incentive to create with the interest that society has in free access to knowledge and art. The Statute of Anne thus helped nurture and channel the spate of inventiveness that Enlightenment society and its successors have since enjoyed.

http://www.economist.com/node/15868004?story_id=15868004



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list