[lbo-talk] Wherein Krugman laments his cribbing of Henwood has come to naught

Marv Gandall marvgand at gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 04:19:16 PDT 2011


I did note that if a resulting movement of the unemployed and an organized anticapitalist left begin to grow, etc. etc., then you will have the material base for more radical action by the system to save itself. On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Gar Lipow <gar.lipow at gmail.com> wrote:


> You left out the most important thing - the existence of left mass
> movement with specific demands. Without that no amount of crisis will
> drive the system to adapt even mildly left solutions. If faced with a
> truly radical left mass movement with real power, even a mild crisis
> could be used to extract some concessions from the ruling class. when
> Doug describes the degeneracy or decadence of our ruling class or
> power elite, I think an argument could be made that a lot of what they
> do today they always would have done in the absence of any left
> threat, and that to the extent they have changed goal and character,
> it is due to too long without a threat from the left. I'm guess I"m
> making an argument that a strong and vibrant left movement plays an
> essential role in capitalism.and is part of the capitalist system.
> When capitalism defeats the left to the point that(as in the U.S)
> there is not left but only leftists, or as in Europe a left exists,
> but one so weak it can't do much more than leftists in the U.S. it
> destroys something vital to its own long term survival.
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Marv Gandall <marvgand at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2011-09-22, at 5:49 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. But I don't admit that the poor policies come from lack of
> intelligence. They have _some_ sort of material base, and I have seen no
> real efforts to identify that base. Some sort of systematic pressure on
> capitalist action and thought is operating. (Nor do I admit it is because of
> the Yahoos. There is no real opposition to the Yahoos -- and that needs
> explanation. I have seen none.
> >
> >
> > There is not the same urgency to resuscitate and reform the system as
> there was in the 30's, because the the economic and political crisis, while
> provoking great anxiety, has to date not been as severe as the Great
> Depression, and the capitalists are still hoping to somehow muddle through.
> >
> > If official unemployment rises to 25% from 9%, if 50% rather than less
> than 1% of banks fail, if the economy contracts by 25% after recovering from
> a less than 5% fall, if prices drop by 25% rather than remaining stable, if
> the stock market falls by 90%, if there is a wave of bankruptcies by today's
> cash-rich corporations, if a resulting movement of the unemployed and an
> organized anticapitalist left begin to grow, etc. etc., then you will have
> the material base for more radical action by the system to save itself.
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Facebook: Gar Lipow Twitter: GarLipow
> Grist Blog: http://www.grist.org/member/1598
> Static page: http://www.nohairshirts.com
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list