>"Reform isn't happening? Okay, then let's try revolution." If they
>don't understand why that makes no sense, it's because they read too
>much Semiotexte and not enough history.
You see Semiotexte in those working manifesto papers Doug took pictures of? I don't (not that I've kept up on Semiotexte for some time.)
Could it be there's not enough reading of anything in particular (which I take to be one bottom line of the anti-activistism argument)?