Both real in different ways and sometimes simultaneously.
Joanna
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dennis Claxton" <ddclaxton at earthlink.net> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org, lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 10:36:28 PM Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Noam Chomsky is losing it
At 10:30 PM 9/27/2011, 123hop at comcast.net wrote:
>I have to admit I am confused by this issue. For example, when I
>look at the way in which justice is dealt to brown vs white people,
>it seems like racism is at work. But I'm willing to learn if someone
>can explain to me why this isn't racism
Who said it wasn't?
Not Reed. In the passage you clipped he says "of course racism persists, in all the disparate, often unrelated kinds of social relations and "attitudes" that are characteristically lumped together under that rubric..."
He's basically saying that calling out someone as racist is not politics because, again in the part you clipped, "It doesn't lend itself to any particular action except more taxonomic argument about what counts as racism."
I'm confused by why this is so confusing.
___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk