I'm not talking *probability* here, but *possibility*.
I object to accepting the premise of the Keynesians of the state as a some sort of deux ex machina without anything anchoring it to the social ground. Because a lot of economic and political ideology gets smuggled that way. That is all.
One doesn't need to be a conspiracy junkie or an anarchist (with all due respect) to entertain these scenarios. History provides plenty of pabulum.
Back to my cave.