>Now this post suffers from the approach which it condemns: i.e. it focuses
>too much on Joanna.
true
>Perhaps I should have tried to discover some other
>framing topic for attacking personal moral judgment. But that is one of the
>effects of moral judgment; it is hard to respond to without falling into the
>fault attacked.
just ignore it and tell them poster whose work you enjoy that their efforts are appreciated.
>I disagree in many ways with Ted -- but I greatly appreciate his presence on
>the list. I certainly do not find it depressing. I've learned from it over
>the years and hope to continue to do so.
agreed.
Kelley
>Carrol
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
>On Behalf Of // ravi
>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:11 PM
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] compare and contrast
>
>On Apr 16, 2012, at 9:14 PM, 123hop at comcast.net wrote:
> > I wonder what life form Marx would have assigned to those who are unable
>to communicate except through quotations from Marx.
> >
>
>Zing!
>
>I know: Marxstricts? Proliteralists?
>
>
> > It is both irritating and profoundly depressing.
>
>
>Amen! At least other fundies have more amusing gods :-).
>
> -ravi (ducking.)
>
>
>P.S: no insult to Ted Winslow, or Shane. Really. I am talking about the
>entire list! :-)
>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)