> Doesn't Taft-Harley specifically allow states
> to have "right to work for less" laws?
29 U.S.C. 164(b) -
"Agreements requiring union membership in violation
of State law.
"Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as authorizing
the execution or application of agreements requiring membership
in a labor organization as a condition of employment in any State
or Territory in which such execution or application is prohibited
by State or Territorial law."