I don't understand that. "Yes, this is why I like guns. But those *other* people, well, they are clearly at a firing range to become skilled at killing people.l"
I know a guy who carries a manbag, wears scarves, gets his hair dyed three colors to be fashionable, wears skinny hipster jeans, and loves to have salon days for pampering....
he likes to go to shoot at targets because he likes to be good at it. the same way someone likes to be good at words with friends, solitaire, or cycling. There's nothing he wants to kill.He wants to aim and hit a target. BFD.
He has other hobbies like building a 3-d printer, his dachshunds, his aquarium, a cactus garden... Just once in a while, he wants to shoot a gun at a target. It's a skill that he wants to cultivate, no less than he wants to be a good drummer or be good at making a pho dinner.
>You misread me: it's eagerness to be ready to kill, not to kill. It's
>difficult to believe that people want to carry in urban areas for an
>impromptu round of plinking. By contrast the hunters I've encountered take
>the don't point at people rule seriously enough that they won't play paintball.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > At 08:52 AM 12/21/2012, Wojtek S wrote:
> >> Andy: " I start noticing the
> >> eagerness among some to be ready to kill people (God forbid), and a
> >> thousand other neglected pastimes beckon."
> >>
> >> [WS:] I suggest you read Jack Katz "Seductions of Crime"
> >> http://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-05/books/bk-86_1_jack-katz
> >>
> >> "Katz's claim is that criminals seek not material rewards but the
> >> sensual experience of the crime itself. The adolescent shoplifter, for
> >> example, savors not the trinket she steals but the challenge of
> >> sneaking it past the clerk, the thrill of having outsmarted the
> >> system. With stickup men, as with members of adolescent street gangs,
> >> it is the transcendent joy of dominating an adversary. With the
> >> impassioned killer, it is to vent the rage triggered by humiliation or
> >> by a threat to some cherished moral value."
> >>
> >> See also:
> >> criminology.fsu.edu/.../SeductionsofCrimeJackKatz.ppt
> >>
> >> I would imagine that shooting a fire arm evokes similar emotions -
> >> those of power and invincibility that comes from dominating an
> >> adversary. Of course, for the great majority of people it ends with
> >> just that - a short lived thrill - after which they go back to their
> >> homes and offices and live long and normal lives. But a few less
> >> stable or deranged individuals will carry that thrill further.
> >>
> >> I am not saying that guns cause this kind of emotions, but rather that
> >> they are one of many things that trigger them. I recall taking part
> >> in a few demos where people demolished cars and other property or
> >> fought the cops or counter-demonstrators with sticks and stones - I
> >> noticed a sense of thrill, empowerment and invincibility I experienced
> >> from merely being a part of such a crowd. Holding a rock or a stick
> >> elevated that thrill to a much higher level - the fact that you could
> >> use that rock or that stick to dominate your adversary (a cop or a
> >> member of a counter-demo) was a source of enormous motivation to keep
> >> going even if from a rational point of view the potential cost of
> >> "going" was very high (injury, arrest or both) and potential outcome
> >> rather low. (PS In all cases, I could not get close enough to the
> >> action to actually use these implements, but being a wuss I wonder if
> >> I that inability was not a form of a "Freudian slip".)
> >>
> >> I do not think any rationalist arguments can adequately address the
> >> emotions evoked by the acts of dominating an adversary - regardless of
> >> whether such acts are real (such as breaking the law or physically
> >> attacking someone) or symbolic (e.g. shooting a weapon or watching an
> >> action movie). I think such emotions are in every one of us, we only
> >> handle them differently. Some (including myself) try to suppress them
> >> and subject to rational control, others (probably the majority)
> >> relegate them to the realm of fantasy and enjoy them by engaging in
> >> symbolic acts (watching movies, playing video games, or shooting
> >> weapons), and a few cross the socially acceptable line and enjoy them
> >> by engaging in real life acts (be it riots, gang violence, or mass
> >> shooting.)
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wojtek
> >>
> >> "An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."
> >> ___________________________________
> >> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
> > --
> > http://cleandraws.com
> > Wear Clean Draws
> > ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)