(Maclcolm Lowy, in Monthly Review, November, 1998)
Angelus did not give the date of the quotation from Luxemburg, but it was presumably before 1915. And of the writer's quoted, only a line or two in this passage from RL exhibit any assurance that the Non-Barbarism future is inevitable. It seems to me that the moment one eliminates this suggestion of inevitability (which, as Lowy points out is a leftover from Bourgeois theories of Progress built into history) -- only this gives even the weakest peg on which to hang babblings of "Faith." All of them assume that history is not theorizable, or as Sweezy argued, socialism is NOT a science, and hence cannot be predicted (Scenarios are anti-Marxist). The implications of The Present as History is that capitalism is so totally destructive that, if not overthrown (and that cannot be predicted) the result will be barbarism and the possible destruction of humanity.
All the arguments are if. . .then; all cite human struggle with its unpredictable oucomes, as the only _possible_ means of avoiding the probable barbarism of humanity.
All assume the necessity of enduring defeats because the (incredibly foolish) insistence on a scenario guaranteeing victory constitutes a final surrender to the inevitability of barbarism.
If that grim prognosis, that total rejection of the Ideology of Progress, be faith, we need more of it.
Carrol
All things fall and are built again, And those who build them again are gay.