>Reference to external sources is always a matter of interest, but any
>insistence by any poster that such and such a source MUST be consulted (or
>that such consultation is a prerequisite to participation in a given
>discussion is a deliberate attempt to sabotage the very existence of the
>list as a forum.
So you're taking back this admonition you wrote last week?
>Any one who refers to 'the '60s' even in casual dinner-table chat
>without having read Ted Morgan's book is proliferating nonsense
>(often in its most vicious form of half-truths).