[lbo-talk] Labor Imperialism

c b cb31450 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 08:14:03 PST 2012


Not just that. It's what's expected of junior partners. It assures that invitations to the White House will be forthcoming. And there's ideological affinity too. I recall a WSJ article from the late 1980s or early 1990s, during some serious labor unrest in S Korea, that quoted an AFL-CIO advisor on the scene as saying, "The problem with Korean unions is that they don't know how to control their rank and file." The AFL-CIO (remember when George H.W. slipped and said AFL-CIA?) has always been anti-communist, and you don't need to have communists around to be anti-communist.

Doug

^^^^ CB: See Lenin's anticipation of this and articulation of the processes of opportunism, labor lieutenants of capital, labor aristocracy based in imperialist super-profits or booty. (_Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism_) . And Engels on bourgeoisification of British workers based in same imperialist booty. In the US this is aggravated by hierarchical division of workers based in white supremacy.

George Meany was a literal spy or OSS agent in France after WWII , working against Communists in trade unions; he later headed the AFL-CIO as Cold War agency of US imperialism.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list