[lbo-talk] A liberal geek defense of Ron Paul

shag carpet bomb shag at cleandraws.com
Mon Jan 2 11:27:56 PST 2012


yeah, but we were talking about non-marxists who don't want to be called liberals who see obama as having betrayed what he supposedly stood for and why they supposedly voted for him.

sheesh. I thought you'd fall down in a faint to see Doug taking a view completely opposite of the one he's taken for the past three years!


>^^^^^^^
>CB: To posture as if Obama's admin has been some huge "betrayal" ( of
>the rev) of these words is social democratic/ultra-left/Meneshvik
>FRAUD AND PREVARICATION , demagogy. Basically, the Modern Menshevik
>position is that Obama did not single-handedly institute stronger
>Keynesian ( bourgeois "socialist") measures. What a joke.
>
>Who do u Mensheviks think u r fooling ? U don't have a socialist
>program. U r not chastising O with failing to win (single- handedly)
>a socialist or Marxist program. U r chastising him for not
>instituting Paul Liberal Krugman's program. F R A U D !!!
>
>And what goddamn American President ever fulfilled all their campaign
>promises , unless it was bad stuff ? U hold Obama to a standard
>higher than the country has ever had. Same ole racist story. Black
>professionals held to higher standards than whites. Teddy Roosevelt
>did not win the Presidency , let alone institute 8 hour day, women's
>suffrage and unemployment insurance.
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

-- http://cleandraws.com Wear Clean Draws ('coz there's 5 million ways to kill a CEO)



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list