[lbo-talk] Ron Paul on the Civil War

Carl G. Estabrook galliher at illinois.edu
Mon Jan 23 10:47:50 PST 2012


There's hardly any question that the Lincoln presidency marked a substantial increase in central government power and a corresponding diminution of liberty - war is the health of the state.

And the apparently great counter-example - that the Civil War freed the slaves - turns out to be a good deal more ambiguous that it seems. See now Douglas A. Blackmon, "Slavery by Another Name: The Re- Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II" (Doubleday 2008).

The war, a great evil in itself, led to the "loss of liberty" (and life) of more than a half million Americans, plus those injured and immiserated.

It was a contest between two ruling classes with incompatible methods of exploiting labor - chattel slavery and wage slavery. The latter won, but it's not at all clear that liberty did.

--CGE

On Jan 23, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Doug Henwood wrote:


>
> On Jan 23, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Carl G. Estabrook wrote:
>
>> In fact, far from being a racist, Ron Paul is the only major party
>> candidate who has attacked the single most racist program of the
>> federal government, the "war on drugs."
>
> You really have to wonder how much a man values black people when he
> says that the Civil War marked a loss of liberty. I've spent a lot
> of time following the right and I still find that remark shocking.
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list