[lbo-talk] Capitalism and porn

[// ravi]

On Jan 23, 2012, at 3:06 PM, 123hop at comcast.net wrote:
> 
> I think the argument in the article was nearly worthless about the relation between male dominance and good sex. I mean sex was pretty damn good in the sixties/seventies -- no fear of pregnancy or disease -- and a good amount of reciprocation between the sexes. I don't know much about the last twenty years though as single motherhood has yielded little data.
> 

Ah, the sixties. Really missed that one.


> I always thought that men under forty (at least) were always in a state of semi permanent erection.

I can say from recent history: fortunately not! :-)

	—ravi