Which is why he didn't amount to a hill of beans?
T: Wow, what a stunning illustration of the Sorites paradox. Anyway I just find the idea of "consulting" a theory before you decide what to do next rather ridiculous.
From: "Carrol Cox" <cbcox at ilstu.edu> Subject: [lbo-talk] The '60s
I say this partl to explain the sheer assertiveness, without supporting argument or qualification.
T: It comes as a relief to know that it wasn't anything to do with your personality.
Anyone who wants to engage in the c oming struggles triggered by Wisconsin & expanded by OWS will have read Ted Morgan's book or he/she is not serious in his/her claimed political intentions.
Any one who refers to 'the '60s' even in casual dinner-table chat without having read Ted Morgan's book is proliferating nonsense (often in its most vicious form of half-truths).
T: I could have sworn I remembered being around in the '60s and having memories of it. Turns out I was full of "nonsense", by definition. The things you learn on this list...
-------------- next part -------------- All Email originating from UWC is covered by disclaimer http://www.uwc.ac.za/emaildisclaimer