[lbo-talk] Ron Paul Admits He's On Social Security, Even Though He Believes It's Unconstitutional

[ken hanly]

 I agree. He has no choice but to pay into the system but then on principle he is supposed to not collect the benefits! To not collect I would not call principled in such circumstances but stupid! 

Cheers, ken

 
Blog:  http://kenthink7.blogspot.com/index.html
Blog:  http://kencan7.blogspot.com/index.html

----- Original Message -----
From: Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu>
To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
Cc: 
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 9:11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Ron Paul Admits He's On Social Security, Even Though He Believes It's Unconstitutional

This is not an acceptable criticism of Paul. His position is valid. I
support the liquidation of capitalist relations but I very happily take
advantage of whatever advantages I draw from it. I despise Shell Oil, but I
buy gasoline (or used to when I drove) from the most convenient spot, be it
Shell or Exxon. I've expressed this anti-moralistic view of anti-capitalism
continuously   on this list. There is no reason whatever why Paul should not
both oppose Social Security and at the same time profit from it. No
contradiction. No irony. No point to make against Paul.

Carrol

-----Original Message-----
From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org]
On Behalf Of c b
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 3:20 PM
To: lbo-talk
Subject: [lbo-talk] Ron Paul Admits He's On Social Security,Even Though He
Believes It's Unconstitutional

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/20/ron-paul-social-security_n_1612117.
html
___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

___________________________________
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk