Of course, at certain point the whole system is going to crash anyway when the ability to borrow inevitably evaporates, but this does not make things any worse than "raw" capitalism experiencing business cycles. However, it creates an illusion that "the market works" either in a 'raw' form in with Keynesian macro-management, and the crash was just an 'accident" that could have been avoided. As the results, the marks that have been cheated out of their money tighten their belts and start playing the game again, hoping that this time it will work.
This is like trying to make a perpetual motion machine work because of expectations of enormous benefits this will generate. Paradoxically, this belief is what keeps the perpetual motion machine in perpetual motion that the laws of thermodynamics say is impossible.
Wojtek
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, James Heartfield
<Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> ... mind you Lenin’s answer to Charles’ problem ‘wage laborers are only paid so much, and it is always less than enough to buy all the consumer commodities which they produce’ was that workers are not the only consumers. Capitalists consume, both privately consuming luxuries, and as corporations, consuming those intermediate goods and machines that go to make up consumer goods. The total demand, therefore is greater than the demand of the working class. Lenin explains in Capitalism in Russia, which he bases on Marx’s second volume of capital.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- Wojtek http://wsokol.blogspot.com/