[lbo-talk] advertising and marxism

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 26 11:57:15 PDT 2012


I understand that. My point was somewhat different. Due to overproduction capitalists encounter difficulty in realizing profits from their investment (a line of argument recently proposed by Brenner.) Since they not in a position to maintain profits by raising prices (or perhaps "hedonically value" the products) due to overproduction, their only option is to reduce labor cost, either through raising productivity or by lowering wages (or both). The problem with that is that in a long run it decreases aggregate demand (or perhaps dos not keep it up with increases in aggregate supply) which poses a threat to profits. To avert that, at least for a while, they expand consumer credit to maintain a necessary level of aggregate demand.

Of course, at certain point the whole system is going to crash anyway when the ability to borrow inevitably evaporates, but this does not make things any worse than "raw" capitalism experiencing business cycles. However, it creates an illusion that "the market works" either in a 'raw' form in with Keynesian macro-management, and the crash was just an 'accident" that could have been avoided. As the results, the marks that have been cheated out of their money tighten their belts and start playing the game again, hoping that this time it will work.

This is like trying to make a perpetual motion machine work because of expectations of enormous benefits this will generate. Paradoxically, this belief is what keeps the perpetual motion machine in perpetual motion that the laws of thermodynamics say is impossible.

Wojtek

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:20 PM, James Heartfield <Heartfield at blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> ... mind you Lenin’s answer to Charles’ problem ‘wage laborers are only paid so much, and it is always less than enough to buy all the consumer commodities which they produce’ was that workers are not the only consumers. Capitalists consume, both privately consuming luxuries, and as corporations, consuming those intermediate goods and machines that go to make up consumer goods. The total demand, therefore is greater than the demand of the working class. Lenin explains in Capitalism in Russia, which he bases on Marx’s second volume of capital.
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

-- Wojtek http://wsokol.blogspot.com/



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list