On another sub-topic of this thread. A leader of the Chicago Occupation was on the Chicago workshop panel, and he said their main problem was not running too far ahead of their allies in the Fightback against the 1% Mayor. It needed anarchists (of the wilder sort even) to kick the movement into existence as it were, but as Occupiers in different cities get involved in various concrete struggles involving many others, a discipline kicks in -- not forced by outsider kvetching but by the internal dynamic of the movement: and Graeber or ' the Graeber tendency' gets subordinated. Pure speculation, but that could cause tension. You can't, for example, keep dissing public schools if workers at those public schools become the front line of resistance. It will get 'worse' if workers were able by direct action to force the "state" to enforce safety regulations. (A sudden entertaining fantasy: KP was one of the first 'military' functions to be commodified: imagine a nation-wide strike by workers in military mess halls.)
Carrol -----Original Message----- From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of Doug Henwood Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:26 PM To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] Graeber's latest...
On May 11, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> I don't doubt that
> sleep, for example, has a different 'meaning' in capitalist society
Speaking of which, someone told me that pre-artificial light people would frequently get up during the night and visit with friends and/or screw and then go back to sleep. With artificial light, and no doubt the temporal discipline of the pig system, this all changed. Has anyone else heard this?
Doug ___________________________________ http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk