On 2012-10-06, at 2:32 PM, Dennis Claxton wrote:
> On 10/6/2012 7:47 AM, Marv Gandall wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately true, because the issue only touches a very tiny handful of victims and their families (on both sides, as Dennis C. noted), and people are typically unmoved unless their own interests are directed affected.
>
>
> No time to elaborate but this essay is highly recommended:
>
> Killing a Chinese Mandarin: The Moral Implications of Distance (Carlo Ginzburg)
This article could serve as an appendix:
"For a new generation of young guns, the experience of piloting a drone is not unlike the video games they grew up on. Unlike traditional pilots, who physically fly their payloads to a target, drone operators kill at the touch of a button, without ever leaving their base – a remove that only serves to further desensitize the taking of human life. (The military slang for a man killed by a drone strike is "bug splat," since viewing the body through a grainy-green video image gives the sense of an insect being crushed.) As drone pilot Lt. Col. Matt Martin recounts in his book Predator, operating a drone is "almost like playing the computer game Civilization" – something straight out of "a sci-fi novel." After one mission, in which he navigated a drone to target a technical college being occupied by insurgents in Iraq, Martin felt "electrified" and "adrenalized," exulting that "we had shot the technical college full of holes, destroying large portions of it and killing only God knew how many people."