[lbo-talk] 3'd party debates

martin schiller mschiller at pobox.com
Mon Oct 22 13:24:05 PDT 2012


On Oct 21, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Marv Gandall wrote:


>
> On 2012-10-21, at 4:39 PM, Gar Lipow wrote:
>
>> I'm getting
>> the impression that among young people to the left the crazy right
>> "socialist" is no longer the scary word it used to be. It may be
>> terrifying to loder people and and third of the population who is deeply
>> reactionary, but among the rest people are perfectly willing to listen to
>> socialists, without the term arousing special suspicions or shutting down
>> their ability to hear. Impressin. Dunno if the data backs this..
>
> Some evidence to support your impression, bearing in mind that for many ypeople socialism means strengthening the welfare state, making capitalism more "humane".

I've been considering arguing a definition of socialism as a state corporation with national residents as equal (non-transferable) shareholders. The role of the corporation being to meet the needs of the shareholders through marketing of national resources.

It seems to me to be a metaphor that would resonate widely given our present social environment.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list