[lbo-talk] No rights for Tsarnaev?

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 22 11:33:42 PDT 2013


Actually, Obama administration decided NOT to treat his as enemy combatant, contrary to demands of some Republicans. So Obama bashing seems a bit misplaced, again.

Wojtek

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Chuck Grimes <cagrimes42 at gmail.com> wrote:


>
>> The last three words make nonsense of this.
>>
>> The threat does NOT come from "the right" ; the threat comes from Obama,
>> Clinton, et al.
>>
>> A focus on the "right" relegates the writer to the ranks of the mere
>> onlooker in the bleachers.
>>
>> Carrol
>>
>
> It's a reading error. R E I C H means state in German I think. It was
> supposed to indicate the US justice system has thrown out traditional law
> and turned to dictatorial power. And I agree the threat comes from the
> Obama administration. They want that kind of power and have done their best
> to keep it in place. So has Congress.
>
> CG
> ______________________________**_____
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/**mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk>
>

-- Wojtek

"An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list