Wojtek Sent from my Droid On Apr 24, 2013 9:21 PM, "Chuck Grimes" <cagrimes42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> You are missing the point. That student government got this to an open
> vote is a win in a long standing battle between student groups at UCB, that
> reflects the larger battle against the US and Israel.
>
> Of course it is meaningless in direct action outcomes. It remains a
> symbolic gesture. Unfortunately places like Berkeley, Madison, et al are
> sometimes good at symbolic gestures and not much else.
>
> There is another level of contention to the resolution and that is whether
> or not the ASUC senate controls how ASUC funds are spent and in this case
> invested. At a guess, there is probably a committee with administration
> oversight that can control that power if it wants to. This level showed up
> now and again in yore and included who could speak on campus and who
> couldn't. The ASUC is an alternate source of funding for speakers and
> entertainment gigs.
>
> It occurred to me that if progressive student groups wanted to really get
> a bang for their bucks, they could have scheduled a series or panel of
> speakers ranging from Norman Finkelstein to Shlomo Sand to deconstruct the
> heroic myths of Israel and Zionism. As I learned from studying Weimar, it
> is a very old fracture that attempts to weld together an identity that
> Jewish equals Zionism equals Israel.
>
> I'd like to add several academics who would include radical
> anthropologists and sociologists to illuminate the entire formative process
> of national identities and their universal fabrications. The identity
> formation process taps into some sort of psyche bound propensity toward
> tribalism. This prehensility is how we grasp and creat the social and
> ourselves as social beings.
>
> While that view seems far removed from more concrete issues, I would argue
> it is at the core of the problem, which is manifest in the historical-legal
> concept of citizenship. This concept is almost universally constructed on
> exclusion through a whole state apparatus, just to filter out who
> eventually ends up in a room with the flag and can take an oath of
> allegiance. The last thing that a state wants is a open inclusive apparatus.
>
> CG
>
>
> ______________________________**_____
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/**mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk<http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk>
>