Well you don't know where the non-voters stand. In consensus parlance they have chosen to step aside. But ignoring non voters, 2501 for to 2500 against is such a weak hand that most unions would choose not to strike in those circumstances. A strike authorization vote usually leaves the leadership the choice to strike or not. And with that little support the choice likely would be "not". The thing is though such close votes are not common in strike votes. Whereas a tiny percentage of scabs amid large support for a strike is pretty common. So your example is rare in the real world whereas mine has a pretty common counterpart in the real world., Again someone who scabs in a majority rule system would be likely to block in a consensus system. And scabs (even from within the union) do often exist in real strikes. Whereas votes that close are rare. Normally strike authorizations come with an overwhelming majority or they fail. (In the USA I mean).
>
>
> Bill Bartlett
> Bracknell Tas
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- Facebook: Gar Lipow Twitter: GarLipow Solving the Climate Crisis web page: SolvingTheClimateCrisis.com Grist Blog: http://grist.org/author/gar-lipow/ Online technical reference: http://www.nohairshirts.com