Wojtek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:33 PM, <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
> But the means of accomplishing things has a lot to do with the kind of world we wind up living in.
>
> I'd also submit that your reluctant acceptance of neo-liberalism might have something to do with your relatively privileged position in a neoliberal world. Not relative to Bill Gates, but relative to at least half the population.
>
> Joanna
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> These are classic symptoms of being a cult, and reading Graeber only
> confirms that this tendency is well and alive. Quite frankly, I think
> these "movements" are intellectually bankrupt and have nothing to
> offer - zip, zilch, nada, zero - except their participatory rituals.
> They are nothing but secular versions of religious cults that are a
> dime a dozen in this "post-modern" world. While nothing forces me to
> be a part of these cults, this nonetheless leaves me sad because it
> makes it obvious that there is no viable counterweight to the
> neoliberal hegemony - at least one that I can identify with. The only
> moderately viable (in the sense getting popular support) counterweight
> is Islamist fundamentalism - but having to choose between the two, I'd
> take neoliberalism.
>
>
> --
> Wojtek
>
> "An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- Wojtek
"An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."