[lbo-talk] The political consequences of academic paywalls

Wojtek S wsoko52 at gmail.com
Fri Jan 18 04:39:19 PST 2013


http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/01/2013117111237863121.html

When we talk about academic research being shielded from the general public, we forget that the general public includes non-academic experts to whom such research is directly relevant – such as lawyers, doctors, journalists, policy officials, and activists. Academics love to complain about superficial reporting or uninformed policy, but their own system denies professionals the opportunity to add depth to their work. With database subscription fees running tens of thousands of dollars, even prestigious organizations cannot afford to penetrate the paywall.

I regularly receive requests for my academic articles, and I always comply – as do most of the academics I know. Contrary to popular perception, most scholars want their work to be read. But for every researcher plaintively tweeting that they need a paywalled PDF, there are many for whom tracking down barricaded knowledge seems too much trouble. Instead, they rely on what resources are available. This means that a lot of academic research, some of which could have profound political implications, is ignored.

-- Wojtek

"An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list