This brings me to a broader point that it is not possible to have "unqualified" politically neutral democracy. You can have either a social democracy (like in Scandinavia) when the "99 percent" decisively put the business class under the boot, or a plutocracy (like in the US) when the business class puts the "99 percent" under the boot using elections as a subterfuge. These are the only two relatively stable outcomes that have some semblance to what is commonly understood as "democracy." A politically neutral democracy in a class society is merely a temporary standoff that is inherently unstable and will likely result in a fascist putsch, as the cases of Weimar republic or Chile demonstrate. Or to put it differently, plutocracy and fascism are the only political outcomes that the business class can produce on its own.
-- Wojtek
"An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."