> I'm kind of reaching a pox on both their houses level at this point with
> this 'debate'. Zizek's commentary has been incoherent, while Chomsky
> continually insists on a set of irrelevant standards for critical
> theoretical work, ignoring the substantial differences between the
> historical meanings of the anglo-american concept of science as opposed the
> German Wissenschaft or the French Science. Robert Wood
================
I sense an impending outbreak of pluralism and polysemy regarding science[s]. Oh, and the aporias of expertise and authority.