What a quaint position. ;)
Lawyers or people who follow these things out there, I'm curious. Is there *any* recent ruling granting or extending 4th amendment rights to a situation involving technologies that came into wide use in the 20th C and beyond? That is, beyond hoary protections that must (it seems) involve ones home, clothing or body, or mail--old-fashioned paper mail, of course. It seems the rulings are all going the other way, toward allowing police to do almost anything (e.g., automobiles), or acting like the 4th amendment never applies in the first place (e.g., cell phones, emails).
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Jordan Hayes <jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com>wrote:
> c.f. 4th amendment
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 18:41, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > How is it different from traffic cameras or cops
> > sitting in their cruisers and watching for speeders?
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>