[lbo-talk] WMD redux

Dennis Redmond metalslorg at gmail.com
Tue Jun 18 08:14:01 PDT 2013


Oh, I'm as skeptical as anyone. But these sources are reliable because I've seen, over and over again, for months and now for years, that what they report is eventually confirmed by multiple sources, and eventually by the mainstream media. (Hanano's articles, widely available on the web, are excellent).

Hezbollah's decline is truly tragic. They were once a genuine anti-imperialist force. By a cruel irony, many of the citizens of Qusair chased out by Hezbollah were the same folks who generously sheltered Lebanese refugees during Israel's monstrous 2006 war. It's the sad fate of social movements which don't have a coherent critique of transnational capitalism to gradually morph into that capitalism's most ardent gendarmes.

-- DRR

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:


> DRR: " reliable social media sites covering the Syrian revolution"
>
> [WS:] How do you know they are reliable? I have seen a similar situation
> with Eastern European emigres - if you listen to them you would get a
> picture of unspeakable horror on a scale never seen before. Most of these
> stories were fantastic and testing people's credibility, yet many Americans
> bought them wholesale. This is not to say that the regime was not
> authoritarian and it did not commit human rights violations, but the
> reality on the groud was nothing like the stories told by the opponents.
>
> This was before social media - these horror stories were spread by the word
> of mouth and interviews with the local media willing to put on the air. I
> can imagine that something similar, but on much larger scale must be going
> on the social media. Hence my question - how do you know they are
> reliable?
>
> I am not trying to defend the Syrian regime in any way or, for that matter,
> bash Obama's administration that in my view is acting very responsibly
> under severe pressure - I just do not trust any stories coming out of that
> civil war. And the stories about WMDs just do not add up. It does not
> seem plausible that local militias have access to WMDs - it looks more
> likely a false flag operation - someone staging these attacks to force
> Western countries to intervene on the side of the rebels. From what I
> heard, some al qaeda units fighting against regime have no problems
> executing other opponents of the regime, so it is not that far-fetched that
> they use them as victims in false flag operations involving chemical
> agents.
>
> Such false flag operations have been rather common in the history of
> warfare, see for example Operation Himmler
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Himmler
>
>
> --
> Wojtek
>
> "An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list