[lbo-talk] If you live in the USA, you probably have already committed a felony today

c b cb31450 at gmail.com
Sun Jun 23 11:57:04 PDT 2013


Whoever thought the US secret police didn't have "illegal" access to everything on the telephone and internet ?. Since the great Liberal Mr. Justice Holmes did not uphold the First Amendment rights of socialists leafletting against WWI, the Palmer Raids, _Whitney_, in which the great liberal justice Brandeis failed to uphold a Communist's Bill of Rights rights, since the Black Panthers were violated by the FBI and police, we are not sanguine about the durability of bourgeois democratic republic's shell of democratic rights for Communists and socialists, anyway.

But the protest against the Patriot Act is very important and radical. Reverse the Patriot Act

On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM, c b <cb31450 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Since this has pertinence today, my position is not that _if_ you are
> innocent, you have nothing to worry about. As a representative of the
> Communist Party USA legacy in which thousands and tens of thousands
> were treated as not innocent when they were innocent, framed in a
> complex way, I am well aware of the ability of the US secret police to
> frame innocents. My position is the best we can do is explicitly and
> exaggeratedly proclaim the innocence and legality of our actions and
> political tactics. But also, right now, lefts are not the target of
> the US secret police as much as during the Cold War.
>
> On the laws, when I was in law school , I had a logic class in which
> we analyzed RICO to be sort of absurdly legally explosive. However ,
> the claim that everybody breaks federal law everyday exaggerates worry
> if only because they can't put everybody in prison.
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 6:13 PM, JOANNA A. <123hop at comcast.net> wrote:
>> If you're going to make these kind of assertions, you need more than guesses.
>>
>> Joanna
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> [WS:] Also, if you live in the USA, the chances are that such a statement
>> is an opening salvo in a campaign to gut some environmental or safety
>> regulation, so some rich assholes can make more money.
>>
>> My guess is that the great majority of these laws being broken daily are
>> safety, traffic, or environmental protection laws or regulations. So I am
>> not sure what the alternative is - some libertarian wet dream in which one
>> does what one can afford to do and the only laws on the books are those
>> protecting private property of the haves?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wojtek
>>
>> "An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list