On May 14, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Angelus Novus wrote:
>
> Some observations sparked by a comment Jim Holstun made on Louis's
> blog, that I think are worth repeating here:
> Jim Holstun wrote:
> “there is more than one Marx–his work isn’t completely coherent.”
> To which I respond:
> Bingo
To which I reply: there is *no* "Marx." There is "*Marx and Engels*" Academics squirreling through a pile of unpublished notes in the "Marx/ Engels" archive are just the ones to decree that Engels's view of the unity of thought of "*Marx and Engels*" is fantastical and unworthy of consideration !!!
Shane Mage
"scientific discovery is basically recognition of obvious realities that self-interest or ideology have kept everybody from paying attention to"