On 2013-10-05, at 3:14 AM, Bill Bartlett wrote:
> Insufficient data, you can't determine anyone's class on the basis of their opinions. Though I notice several people have tried anyhow.
>
> But just because your stupid question has provoked a few stupid answers doesn't change the fact it is a stupid question.
>
> Bill Bartlett
> Bracknell tas
>
>
>
> On 04/10/2013, at 11:07 PM, Wojtek S <wsoko52 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's worth noting these were not the words of activists dressed in colonial
>> garb on their way to a Capitol Hill protest. All these participants did was
>> get paid to attend a focus group in or around their home towns.
>>
>> For them, Greenberg notes, Washington looks nothing like the capital many
>> others see. Gridlock? There is no gridlock. Only a socialist steamroller
>> before which the Republican Party is feeble and afraid. "Evangelicals who
>> feel most threatened by trends embrace the Tea Party because they are the
>> ones who are fighting back," the report states. Republican base voters
>> "think they face a victorious Democratic Party that is intent on expanding
>> government to increase dependency and therefore electoral support."
>>
>> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-04/why-republicans-shut-down-the-government.html
>>
>> [WS:] So how would you classify this large segment of the US population:
>> Working class or bourgeoisie - certainly not the lumpenproletariat and
>> certainly not capitalists.
>>
>> --
>> Wojtek
>>
>> "An anarchist is a neoliberal without money."
>> ___________________________________
>> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk