On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:17 PM, robert wood <wood0257 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Carrol, I'd be curious where you see the difference between the language of
> privilege and the concept of chauvinism that was a significant framework
> for the CP in the 1930's. I have some ideas, but I'm curious about your
> take on the question. Thanks, Robert Wood
This is an interesting and illuminating question.
The concept of 'chauvinism' certainly got mis-used and over-used in the 60s and 70s, sometimes in a manipulative and dishonest way. But at least it *means* something -- denotes something that's real, if subjective. Whereas 'privilege' multiplies something that's real by -1 and then pretends to be a thing in its own right.
Chauvinism refers to beliefs and attitudes and habits -- not always conscious -- which one can actually do something about. One can change one's beliefs and behavior, at least up to a point. But what is one to do about one's 'privilege' -- apart from donning sackcloth and ashes whenever the subject comes up?