Yes! Agreement all around! Although:
"....(despite the total misuse of the term one gets what she's after)..."
But then, in classic concern-troll mode:
"This is simply an honest evaluation of the present, not a malicious judgment but a regretful admission that something has gone wrong."
Nah, AN gets the term right.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Douglas La Rocca <douglarocca at gmail.com>wrote:
> Angelus Novus (Ellen) is correct in her "concern-trolling" estimation
> (despite the total misuse of the term one gets what she's after). I however
> make no apologies for pointing out the faults of the "Left". This is
> because there is no Left, i.e. what passes as Leftism is as the Spartacists
> correctly point out "fake-"/"pseudo-" Leftism.
>
> This is simply an honest evaluation of the present, not a malicious
> judgment but a regretful admission that something has gone wrong.
>
> -dl
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:
>
> > Bill Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > On 12/01/2014, at 3:26 PM, "Carrol Cox" wrote: Up to this point your
> post
> > was interesting. [clip]
> >
> > How so? And if so, you may care to comment on the interesting aspects.
> >
> > -------
> >
> > It _seemed_ (minus the swagger) to be a warning against crudely applying
> > the
> > standards of a middle-school civics book to the conditions of nations
> > under
> > the heel of global capital.
> >
> > Carrol
> >
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Douglas La Rocca
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>